Akhtar v. Mesa et al
Filing
107
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 6/25/2014 ORDERING that the 102 findings and recommendations are ADOPTED IN FULL. Plaintiff's 90 Motion to Amend the Complaint is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAVIAD AKHTAR,
12
No. 2:09-cv-2733 MCE AC P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
J. MESA, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, has filed this civil rights action seeking
17
18
relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge
19
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On May 14, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations to which defendants have filed a response.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed May 14, 2014, are adopted in full; and
3
2. Plaintiff’s motion to file a third amended complaint (ECF No. 90) is denied.
4
Dated: June 25, 2014
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?