Moore v. Evans
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 5/2/2011 ORDERING that ptnr's 20 motion for a notice of appeal nunc pro tunc is DENIED as unnecessary; and the clerk to fwd a copy of this letter to the Ninth Circuit. (cc: Ninth Circuit) (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
TRUITT MOORE,
Petitioner,
9
10
11
12
vs.
MIKE EVANS, Warden,
Respondent.
ORDER
/
13
14
No. 2:09-cv-2737 JFM (HC)
On October 22, 2010, the court issued an order denying petitioner’s petition for
15
writ of habeas corpus and granting a certificate of appealability as to one of petitioner’s two
16
claims. Judgment was entered accordingly. On November 12, 2010, petitioner filed a motion
17
for expansion of the limited certificate of appealability. This motion was denied on January 4,
18
2011. On January 19, 2011, petitioner filed a motion for a notice of appeal nunc pro tunc from
19
the date that the undersigned granted the certificate of appealability. Also on January 19, 2011,
20
petitioner filed a notice of appeal.
21
Examination of the appellate docket in this case through PACER reveals that a
22
notice of appeal was filed on November 19, 2010 and that a briefing schedule was issued on
23
December 14, 2010. See Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 10-17813. On January 20,
24
2011, the appellate court received an amended notice of appeal from the clerk of this court.
25
Petitioner was subsequently appointed counsel on appeal. As of March 28, 2011, that attorney
26
has appeared and is proceeding before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Petitioner’s motion for a notice of appeal nunc pro tunc is denied as
3
unnecessary; and
4
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward a copy of this letter to the Clerk
5
of the Court for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
6
DATED: May 2, 2011.
7
8
9
10
/014;moot2737.noa
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?