United States of America v. Islamic Meat and Poultry Co. et al

Filing 7

JUDGMENT dated *10/23/09* pursuant to order signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 10/23/09. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On October 23, 2009, the Court entered an Order approving the parties' settlement agreement (the Agreement) in this case. In the Agreement, defendants Islamic Meat and Poultry Company, Mohamed Mesallem and Gialal Sbeta agree to the entry of judgment against them, jointly and severally, and in favor of plaintiff United States of America. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that: 1. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of plaintiff United States of America and against defendants Islamic Meat and Poultry Company, Mohamed Mesallem and Gialal Sbeta, jointly and severally (Defendants), in the amount of $18,700; 2. Until the judgment is paid in full, interest shall ACCRUE at 6% interest per annum and compounded annually; and 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ISLAMIC MEAT AND POULTRY COMPANY, MOHAMED MESALLEM, and GIALAL SBETA, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:09-CV-2741-FCD-GGH JUDGMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. The judgment shall be REDUCED to $12,500 with no interest accruing provided the Defendants comply with the reduced judgment repayment schedule set forth in the Agreement and timely file defendant Islamic Meat and Poultry Company's annual reports with the United States Department of Agriculture, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration for the next three reporting years (2010-2012), also as stated in the Agreement. Dated: October 23, 2009 ________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?