Baker v. Perez et al

Filing 144

ORDER denying 143 Motion to Compel signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/17/13. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL BAKER,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2: 09-cv-2757 MCE KJN P

v.

ORDER

PEREZ, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant

17
18

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 8, 2013, the undersigned recommended that defendants’

19

summary judgment motion be granted in part and denied in part. The undersigned also denied

20

plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to obtain newly discovered evidence.
On August 30, 2013, the undersigned granted plaintiff an extension until September 19,

21
22

2013, to file objections to the August 8, 2013 findings and recommendations and to file a request

23

for reconsideration of the August 8, 2013 order denying his motion for extension of time to obtain

24

newly discovered evidence.
On September 4, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion to compel defendant Medina to supplement

25
26

his responses to plaintiff’s interrogatories. Discovery is closed. For that reason, plaintiff’s

27

motion to compel is denied.

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s September 4, 2013 motion to

2

compel (ECF No. 143) is denied.

3

Dated: September 17, 2013

4
5
6

bak2757.ord

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2