Randall v. McDonald et al
Filing
51
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/23/12 ORDERING that within fourteen days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed based on his failure to prosecute this action based on his refusal to accept defendants motion to dismiss.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JERALD RANDALL,
11
Plaintiff,
12
No. 2: 09-cv-2765 KJM KJN P
vs.
13
M.D. McDONALD, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
/
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action
17
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is defendants’ May 1, 2012 motion to
18
dismiss based on plaintiff’s failure to cooperate in discovery. In this motion, defendants also
19
request monetary sanctions. On May 22, 2012, defendants’ counsel filed a declaration stating
20
that the motion to dismiss served on plaintiff was returned unserved with the envelope marked,
21
“RTS–Inmate Refused Chrono on File.”
22
Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed based
23
on his failure to prosecute this action based on his refusal to accept defendants’ motion to
24
dismiss. Failure to respond to this order will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this
25
action.
26
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date of
2
this order, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed based on his failure
3
to prosecute this action based on his refusal to accept defendants’ motion to dismiss.
4
DATED: May 23, 2012
5
6
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
ran2765.osc(2)
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?