Randall v. McDonald et al

Filing 51

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/23/12 ORDERING that within fourteen days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed based on his failure to prosecute this action based on his refusal to accept defendants motion to dismiss.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JERALD RANDALL, 11 Plaintiff, 12 No. 2: 09-cv-2765 KJM KJN P vs. 13 M.D. McDONALD, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE / 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action 17 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is defendants’ May 1, 2012 motion to 18 dismiss based on plaintiff’s failure to cooperate in discovery. In this motion, defendants also 19 request monetary sanctions. On May 22, 2012, defendants’ counsel filed a declaration stating 20 that the motion to dismiss served on plaintiff was returned unserved with the envelope marked, 21 “RTS–Inmate Refused Chrono on File.” 22 Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed based 23 on his failure to prosecute this action based on his refusal to accept defendants’ motion to 24 dismiss. Failure to respond to this order will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this 25 action. 26 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date of 2 this order, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed based on his failure 3 to prosecute this action based on his refusal to accept defendants’ motion to dismiss. 4 DATED: May 23, 2012 5 6 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 ran2765.osc(2) 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?