Scanlon v. Sisto et al
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 06/03/10 granting plaintiff's motion for an extension of time 15 . Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to submit the documents necessary for service. To the extent plaintiff requests the court to order CDCR to provide information to facilitate service of process, the request 15 is denied. (Plummer, M)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 granted; ///// vs. D.K. SISTO, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to submit service documents pursuant to the court's order of April 28, 2010. He has also asked for an order directing CDCR to provide him with addresses of some of the defendants, who have been transferred to different prisons. He alleges that CDCR will not give him the information because he is on high control parole. He does not allege, however, that he has asked and been refused the addresses he needs, that he has asked defense counsel to accept service and been denied, or specified any other steps he has taken to attempt to find the addresses. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's May 19, 2010 motion for an extension of time (Docket No. 15) is ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DAVID BRIAN SCANLAN, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-2808 KJM P
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
2/md scan2808.36
2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to submit the documents necessary for service; and 3. To the extent plaintiff requests the court to order CDCR to provide information to facilitate service of process, the request is denied. DATED: June 3, 2010.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?