Nesbitt v. Jacquez

Filing 26

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 06/15/10 ordering petitioner is informed that so long as he is represented by counsel, he is only to communicate with the court through his counsel. As to status, an order was filed on 05/17/10, granting an extension of time for petitioner to file an amended petition and, if necessary, a motion to stay by 08/11/10. No further pro se requests will be considered in this action while petitioner has counsel. In addition to serving counsel electronically, the clerk of the court is directed on this occasion only, to serve this order by mail upon petitioner at his Pelican Bay State Prison address. (cc: Petitioner at Pelican Bay Address from 25 . (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 G G H :0 0 9 /n e s b 2 8 2 1 .o r d IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROBERT HAYDEN NESBITT, Jr., Petitioner, vs. FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, Warden, Respondent. / Petitioner, a prisoner proceeding with appointed counsel, with an application under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, has filed a request, in a pro se capacity, for case status. Petitioner is informed that so long as he is represented by counsel, he is only to communicate with the court through his counsel. As to status, an order was filed on May 17, 2010, granting an extension of time for petitioner to file an amended petition and, if necessary, a motion to stay by August 11, 2010. No further pro se requests will be considered in this action while petitioner has counsel. In addition to serving counsel electronically, the Clerk of the Court is to directed, on this occasion only, to serve this order by mail upon petitioner at his Pelican Bay State Prison address. See docket # 25. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 15, 2010 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ORDER No. CIV S-09-2821 GEB GGH P

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?