Wright v. Hillcrest Mobile Home Park et al

Filing 5

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/13/09 Recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to compy with a court order and failure to prosecute this action. These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to U.S. District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Within twenty days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections with the Court. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 / By an order filed October 14, 2009, plaintiff was granted twenty days to provide the court with an address at which mail can be sent directly to him or, in the alternative, to show good cause for not providing such an address. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to file a timely notice of change of address or declaration of good cause will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. The twenty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a notice of change of address, a declaration of good cause, or any other response to the court's order. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 11-110. ///// 1 vs. HILLCREST MOBILE HOME PARK, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RONALD WRIGHT, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-2863 GEB DAD PS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:kw

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. A document containing objections should be titled "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: November 13, 2009.

Ddad1\orders.pro se\wright2863.fsc

2