Bank Of America v Yakimenko

Filing 77

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/26/2015 ORDERING the plaintiff to submit a supplemental briefing re 75 Application for Default Judgment within ten (10) days. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as Successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee for the Merrill Lynch First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust, Mortgage Loan AssetBacked Certificates, Series 2007-H-1 and as trustee for the Merrill Lynch First Franklin Mortgage Loan, ORDER Plaintiffs, 16 v. 17 18 No. 2:09-cv-02865-MCE-AC NIKOLAY YAKIMENKO, et al., Defendants. 19 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment (ECF No. 20 21 75). The Court requires additional information prior to ruling on that Application. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, not later than ten (10) days following the date this Order is electronically 2 filed, Plaintiff is required to submit supplemental briefing not to exceed five (5) pages on 3 the following questions: (1) whether and how the operative complaint is actually verified; 4 and (2) how the standard of review applicable to Plaintiff’s application for default 5 judgment in this Court is affected by California Code of Civil Procedure 764.010 (“The 6 court shall not enter judgment by default but shall in all cases require evidence of 7 plaintiff's title and hear such evidence as may be offered respecting the claims of any of 8 the defendants, other than claims the validity of which is admitted by the plaintiff in the 9 complaint.”). See, e.g., Phelan v. Mecom Equipment, LLC, 2013 WL 1313960, at *4 10 11 12 (E.D. Cal. 2013). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 26, 2015 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?