Calloway v. Veal, et al
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/05/11 granting 32 Motion for defendant to conduct deposition by video conference. Nothin in this order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal institution to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available. (Plummer, M)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY,
Plaintiff,
10
11
vs.
12
No. CIV S-09-2907 GEB EFB P
M. VEAL, et al.,
Defendants.
13
/
14
15
ORDER
Defendants VEAL and ANDREASEN seek an order from the Court, pursuant to Federal
16
Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), to permit defendants’ counsel to conduct the deposition of
17
plaintiff JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY (P-97743) via video conference.
18
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
19
1. Defendants’ request to conduct plaintiff’s deposition via video conference is
20
21
GRANTED.
2. Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal institution
22
to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available.
23
Dated: October 5, 2011.
24
25
26
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
