Jackson v. Haviland et al
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/02/11 ordering that within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion for summary judgment/motion for summary adjudication of the issues. (Plummer, M)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
No. CIV S-09-2911 DAD P
13 JOHN W. HAVILAND, et al.,
On September 22, 2011, defendant Herrera filed a motion for summary judgment,
17 or in the alternative, a motion for summary adjudication of issues. Plaintiff has not filed an
18 opposition to the motion.
Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written
20 opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the
21 granting of the motion . . . .” On September 9, 2010, plaintiff was advised of the requirements for
22 filing an opposition to the motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a
23 waiver of opposition to the motion.
Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be
25 grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the
26 inherent power of the Court.” In the court’s September 9, 2010 order, plaintiff was advised
1 that failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the
4 date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion for summary
5 judgment/motion for summary adjudication of the issues. Failure to file an opposition will be
6 deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be
7 dismissed pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
8 DATED: November 2, 2011.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?