Stringer v. Marshall
Filing
49
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/9/2014 ORDERING that, witin 60 days, respondent shall lodge the state court record with the court.(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LONNIE DAVID STRINGER,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:09-cv-2980-GEB-EFB P
v.
JOHN MARSHALL,
15
ORDER
Respondent.
16
Petitioner is a state prisoner with counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C.
17
18
§ 2254. On March 31, 2011, this court granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the action as
19
barred by the statute of limitations contained in the Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty
20
Act (“AEDPA”). ECF No. 30. Later that year, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
21
concluded that AEDPA’s limitations provisions are subject to an equitable exception for claims of
22
actual innocence. Lee v. Lampert, 653 F.3d 929 (9th Cir. 2011) (en banc). The United States
23
Supreme Court agreed in 2013. McQuiggin v. Perkins, __ U.S. __, 133 S. Ct. 1924, 1928, 1933
24
(2013).
On appeal, the Ninth Circuit affirmed this court’s determinations that: (1) petitioner is not
25
26
entitled to statutory tolling; (2) the federal statute of limitations began to run when petitioner’s
27
conviction became final; and (3) petitioner is not entitled to equitable tolling. ECF No. 38.
28
/////
1
1
However, because this court did not consider whether petitioner qualified for the equitable
2
exception based on actual innocence, the Ninth Circuit remanded the case for consideration of
3
that single issue, citing McQuiggin. Id.
4
The court finds it necessary to review the state court record of petitioner’s criminal case to
5
determine whether petitioner has made the necessary showing. Accordingly, within 60 days of
6
the date of this order, respondent shall lodge the state court record with the court. Rule 5(c), 28
7
U.S.C. foll. § 2254.
8
So ordered.
9
Dated: April 9, 2014.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?