Norsworthy v. Cate, et al

Filing 93

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/7/2013 GRANTING defedant's 91 motion and the court clarifies/modifies the prior order such that it comports with the court's 6/21/2012 scheduling order. (See Order for Details) (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JEFFREY BRYAN NORSWORTHY,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

vs.

ORDER

RIVERS,
Defendant.
/

16
17
18
19

No. 2:09-CV-2989-LKK-CMK-P

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Pending before the court is defendant’s motion for clarification (Doc. 91) of the

20

court’s March 29, 2013, order. In that order, the court stated: “The parties may conduct

21

additional discovery through July 1, 2013, with motions to compel due within 30 days of this

22

cut-off date.” Defendant seeks clarification as to whether July 1, 2013, is the last day to

23

propound discovery or whether discovery “must be completed by that date.” The court hereby

24

grants defendant’s motion and clarifies/modifies the prior order such that it comports with the

25

court’s June 21, 2012, scheduling order. Specifically, the parties may conduct discovery until

26

July 1, 2013. All requests for discovery shall be served by this discovery cut-off date.
1

1

Responses to requests for discovery shall be due 45 days after the requests is served. Any

2

motions necessary to compel discovery shall be filed within 60 days from the July 1, 2013,

3

discovery cut-off date.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6
7
8

DATED: May 7, 2013
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2