Mefford v. Cameron Park Community Service District et al
Filing
42
STIPULATION and ORDER 41 signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/8/10: The hearing on dfts' 18 , 21 , 25 , 28 Motions to Dismiss, and 9 , 16 , 22 , 23 Motions to Strike is hereby CONT'D from 5/5/2010 to 6/16/2010 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Kastilahn, A)
1 LAW OFFICE OF MARY-ALICE COLEMAN MARY-ALICE COLEMAN, SBN 98365 2 THOMAS B. GILL, SBN 146275 1109 Kennedy Place, Suite #2 3 Davis, CA 95616 Telephone: (916) 498-9131 4 Facsimile: (916) 304-0880 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff TAMMY MEFFORD 6 7 8 9 10 11 TAMMY MEFFORD, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) v. ) ) ) CAMERON PARK COMMUNITY SERVICE ) DISTRICT a public entity; ALAN CLARKE, an ) individual; DAVID M. JOHNSON, an individual ) and; KENNETH E. CATER an individual, ) ) Defendants. ) ) CASE NO. 2:09-CV-02992 JAM KJM STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' RULE 12(b)(6) MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND SPECIAL MOTIONS TO STRIKE PURSUANT TO C.C.P. § 425.16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Plaintiff Tammy Mefford ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Cameron Park Community Service
21 District, Alan Clarke, David M. Johnson, and Kenneth E. Cater (collectively, "Defendants") 22 stipulate and agree that the Rule 12(b)(6) Motions to Dismiss and Special Motions to Strike 23 Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (the "Motions") filed by Defendants 24 and currently set for hearing on May 5, 2010 shall be continued to and heard on June 16, 2010. 25 26 27 28 /// /// ///
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' RULE 12(b)(6) MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND SPECIAL MOTIOSN TO STRIKE PURSUANT TO C.C.P. § 425.16/ CASE NO. 2:09-CV-02992 JAM KJM
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1
Said stipulation is based on the fact that counsel for Plaintiff were in trial for approximately
2 four (4) weeks and are currently attending to post-trial matters. Plaintiff has therefore requested 3 that Defendants continue the hearing on the Motions to allow Plaintiff sufficient time to respond to 4 the arguments raised therein. Defendants have agreed to this request and, as such, enter into this 5 Stipulation. 6 7 230(f). 8 DATED: April 7, 2010 9 10 11 12 13 DATED: April 7, 2010 14 15 16 17 18 DATED: April 7, 2010 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: /s/ WILLIAM SCHMIDT Attorney for Defendant ALAN CLARKE DATED: April 7, 2010 By: /s/ JAMES W. WARD Attorney for Defendant CAMERON PARK COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT By: /s/ THOMAS B. GILL Attorney for Plaintiff TAMMY MEFFORD LAW OFFICE OF MARY-ALICE COLEMAN In addition, the parties agree that this Stipulation is authorized by Local Rules 143 and
EVANS WIECKOWSKI & WARD, LLP
DIEPENBROCK & COTTER
By:
/s/ ANTHONY DIEPENBROCK Attorney for Defendant KENNETH CATER
WILLIAM SCHMIDT & ASSOCIATES
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' RULE 12(b)(6) MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND SPECIAL MOTIOSN TO STRIKE PURSUANT TO C.C.P. § 425.16/ CASE NO. 2:09-CV-02992 JAM KJM
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1 2 DATED: April 7, 2010 3 4 5 6 7 8 Good cause appearing therefore, The Rule 12(b)(6) Motions to Dismiss and Special Motions to Strike Pursuant to California By: /s/ DOMENIC SPINELLI Attorney for Defendant DAVID JOHNSON LAPLANTE SPINELLI & DONALD
9 Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 filed by Defendants Cameron Park Community Service 10 District, Alan Clarke, David M. Johnson, and Kenneth E. Cater in this matter, currently set for 11 hearing on May 5, 2010, shall be continued to and heard on June 16, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. in 12 Department 6 of this Court. 13 14 15 DATED: April 8, 2010 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' RULE 12(b)(6) MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND SPECIAL MOTIOSN TO STRIKE PURSUANT TO C.C.P. § 425.16/ CASE NO. 2:09-CV-02992 JAM KJM
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ John A. Mendez________ Hon. John A. Mendez Judge, U.S. District Court Eastern District of California
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?