Mitchell v. Schwartzenegger et al

Filing 148

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/6/14 ORDERING that plaintiffs motions (ECF Nos. 143 , 145 ) are denied without prejudice.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN MITCHELL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:09-cv-3012 JAM KJN P v. ORDER J. HAVILAND, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff has filed two motions 17 18 requesting a court order requiring the Warden at the California Substance Abuse Treatment 19 Facility at Corcoran (“SATF”) to have “R&R” ship plaintiff’s personal property forthwith to 20 plaintiff at Folsom Prison where he is being confined by the court’s order to testify in the John 21 Draper v. D. Rosario case. (ECF Nos. 143; 145 at 1.) Court records indicate that on April 7, 2014, U.S. Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan 22 23 issued an order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum for plaintiff to be produced as a 24 witness for trial in Draper v. Rosario, Case No. 10-cv-0032 KJM EFB P. Plaintiff is advised that 25 if he needs his legal materials in order to assist his testimony as a witness in Draper, plaintiff must 26 file a request in that case. Court records reflect that jury trial in Draper was recently reset to June 27 16, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. Id. (ECF No. 192). 28 //// 1 1 This court is without jurisdiction to issue an order to prison officials at SATF. The instant 2 action is proceeding as to defendants employed at California State Prison, Solano, and plaintiff is 3 presently housed at California State Prison, Sacramento. Thus, plaintiff’s motions are denied 4 without prejudice. 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions (ECF Nos. 143, 145) are denied 6 without prejudice. 7 Dated: May 6, 2014 8 9 /mitc3012.mat 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?