Mitchell v. Schwartzenegger et al

Filing 40

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 04/21/11 ORDERING that plf's 39 Motion for Extension of time is GRANTED; plf has until 05/11/11 to file a response to the Motion to Dismiss; dfts' reply, if any, is due 7 days thereafter. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN EDWARD MITCHELL, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-3012 KJN P vs. GOV. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 ORDER / Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file a response to defendants’ March 24, 2011 motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 18 1. Plaintiff's April 15, 2011 motion for an extension of time is granted; and 19 2. Plaintiff is granted up to and including May 11, 2011, in which to file and 20 serve a response to the motion to dismiss. Defendants’ reply, if any, shall be filed seven days 21 thereafter. 22 DATED: April 21, 2011 23 24 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 mitc3012.36

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?