Mitchell v. Schwartzenegger et al

Filing 77

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/17/13 ADOPTING in full 72 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING without prejudice 68 Motion for TRO. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN EDWARD MITCHELL, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:09-cv-3012 JAM KJN P vs. J. HAVILAND, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 18 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On April 30, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 21 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 1 2 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 30, 2013 (ECF No. 72), are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order (ECF No. 68) is denied without 4 prejudice. 5 DATED: June 17, 2013 6 7 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?