Turner v. California Forensic Medical Group et al
Filing
30
ORDER denying 21 Motion for documents signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/12/11. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTHONY R. TURNER,
12
13
14
No. CIV S-09-3040-CMK-P
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER
CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL
GROUP, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
/
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant
18
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for documents and subpoenas
19
(Doc. 21).
20
Plaintiff is requesting documents from the court pursuant to the California Public
21
Records Act. He is requesting public records and evidence to be produced. Although unclear, it
22
appears that he is requesting the court produce evidence available to him through the discovery
23
process. Discovery has not yet commenced in this action as the case is not at issue and no
24
answer is on file. In fact, service remains outstanding as to several defendants, and others have
25
filed a motion for a more definite statement. Discovery will commence, if appropriate, at a later
26
stage of these proceedings. In the mean time, plaintiff may choose to access public records from
1
1
the appropriate public agency. Plaintiff is advised, however, that the court does not have any
2
evidence or documents to forward to him, nor will the court accept evidence to store. Plaintiff
3
may submit evidence to the court at the appropriate time, such as at trial or in support of a motion
4
for summary judgment.
5
6
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for documents
(Doc. 21) is denied.
7
8
9
10
DATED: July 12, 2011
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?