Turner v. California Forensic Medical Group et al

Filing 30

ORDER denying 21 Motion for documents signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/12/11. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY R. TURNER, 12 13 14 No. CIV S-09-3040-CMK-P Plaintiff, vs. ORDER CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for documents and subpoenas 19 (Doc. 21). 20 Plaintiff is requesting documents from the court pursuant to the California Public 21 Records Act. He is requesting public records and evidence to be produced. Although unclear, it 22 appears that he is requesting the court produce evidence available to him through the discovery 23 process. Discovery has not yet commenced in this action as the case is not at issue and no 24 answer is on file. In fact, service remains outstanding as to several defendants, and others have 25 filed a motion for a more definite statement. Discovery will commence, if appropriate, at a later 26 stage of these proceedings. In the mean time, plaintiff may choose to access public records from 1 1 the appropriate public agency. Plaintiff is advised, however, that the court does not have any 2 evidence or documents to forward to him, nor will the court accept evidence to store. Plaintiff 3 may submit evidence to the court at the appropriate time, such as at trial or in support of a motion 4 for summary judgment. 5 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for documents (Doc. 21) is denied. 7 8 9 10 DATED: July 12, 2011 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?