Lourim v. Shelton et al

Filing 9

NON-RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/25/09: After consideration, the court has determined that it is inappropriate to relate or reassign the cases, and therefore declines to do so. (Kaminski, H)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 //// //// //// v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A.; GEORGE SANDERS; MARK SHELTON and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Defendants. / DANIEL LOURIM, Plaintiff, CIV. NO. S-09-3134 JAM/DAD v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A.; GEORGE SANDERS; and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Defendants. / DANIEL LOURIM, Plaintiff, CIV. NO. S-09-3131 LKK/KJM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6

DANIEL LOUIM, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A.; WELLS FARGO BANK, NA; GEORGE SANDERS and DOES 1-20, inclusive, NON-RELATED CASE ORDER Defendants. CIV. NO. S-09-3136 JAM/EFB

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

/ The court is in receipt of the Notice of Related Cases concerning the above-captioned cases filed November 20, 2009. After consideration, the court has determined that it is

inappropriate to relate or reassign the cases, and therefore declines to do so. This order is issued for informational purposes only, and shall have no effect on the status of the cases, including any previous Related (or Non-Related) Case Order of this court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 25, 2009.