Jones v. David, et al
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/13/11 DENYING 29 Motion for leave to amend. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
MALIK JONES,
Plaintiff,
11
12
vs.
13
No. CIV S-09-3174 FCD KJN (TEMP) P
A. DAVID, et al.,
Defendants.
14
/
15
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis with
16
17
ORDER
this civil rights action seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On July 8, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend his complaint.
18
19
Plaintiff’s motion was not, however, accompanied by a proposed amended complaint. As a
20
litigant proceeding in forma pauperis, plaintiff’s pleadings are subject to evaluation by this court
21
pursuant to the in forma pauperis statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Because plaintiff did not
22
submit a proposed amended complaint, the court is unable to evaluate it. Therefore, plaintiff’s
23
motion for leave to amend must be denied.
24
////
25
////
26
////
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s July 8, 2011, motion for
1
2
leave to amend is denied.
3
DATED: July 13, 2011
4
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
jone3174.10b
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?