Johnson v. Nguyen et al
Filing
21
ORDER 17 for continuance signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 3/31/2010. Status Conference is RE-SET for 6/14/2010 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS). (Marciel, M)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952 DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC. 5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101 PMB #253 CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758 TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516 FAX (916) 481-4224 E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Scott N. Johnson Plaintiff, vs. Hoanghai Nguyen, et al, Defendants
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No.2:09-cv-03176-WBS-EFB PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST AND ORDER RE REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE Status Conference: April 19, 2010 Time: 2:00 pm Courtroom: 5
Plaintiff, extension of
Scott time in
N.
Johnson, to
hereby continue
requests the
an
which
status
conference from April 19, 2010 to June 14, 2010.
Plaintiff
filed a First Amended Complaint on March 11, 2010, which removed Defendant, Kelly Trotter, and replaced with
Defendant, Christopher Trotter. Defendant, summons Mary Ellen Roberts.
Plaintiff also added a new Plaintiff on March received 2010. the A
for
these
Defendants
29,
PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE CIV: S-09-cv-03176-WBS-EFB - 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
continuance to June 14, 2010 for the status conference will give the Plaintiff's process served ample time to serve the new Defendants and for these Defendants to respond to
Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Dated: March 29, 2010 /s/Scott N. Johnson ____ Scott N. Johnson, Attorney for Plaintiff
ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the parties shall have the status conference continued to June 14, 2010. Date: March 31, 2010
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE CIV: S-09-cv-03176-WBS-EFB - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?