Johnson v. Nguyen et al

Filing 46

STIPULATION and ORDER 45 signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 6/22/11 ORDERING the Pretrial Conference is reset for 7/11/2011 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
4 SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952 DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC. 5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101 PMB #253 CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758 TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516 FAX (916) 481-4224 E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net 5 Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson 1 2 3 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Johnson Plaintiff, 14 15 vs. 16 Nguyen, et al Defendants 17 18 Case No.2:09-cv-03176-WBS-EFB STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REQUESTING FOR CONTINUANCE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE Pretrial Conference: 6-27-11 Time: 2:00 p.m. Courtroom: 5 19 20 Plaintiff, Scott N. Johnson, and Defendants, hereby 21 stipulate to an extension of time in which to continue the 22 pretrial 23 Defendants, 24 settlement and hope to settle the above referenced matter 25 prior to the pretrial conference. /// conference Hoanghai of June 27, Nguyen, are 2011. in Plaintiff the process 26 27 28 /// STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REQUESTING FOR CONTINUANCE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE CIV: S-08-cv-03006-GEB-JFM - 1 and of Dated: June 22, 2011 /s/Scott N. Johnson ____ 1 2 Scott N. Johnson, 3 Attorney for Plaintiff 4 5 6 Dated: June 22, 2011 __/s/ Russell S. Humphrey _ 7 8 Russell S. Humphrey, 9 Attorney for Defendant, 10 Hoanghai Nguyen 11 12 13 14 15 ORDER 16 17 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the parties shall have the 18 pretrial conference continued to July 11, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. 19 The trial date of August 23, 2011 shall remain. 20 21 Date: June 22, 2011 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REQUESTING FOR CONTINUANCE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE CIV: S-08-cv-03006-GEB-JFM - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?