Johnson v. Nguyen et al

Filing 48

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 7/7/11: Pretrial Conference RESET for 7/25/2011 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
4 SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952 DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC. 5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101 PMB #253 CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758 TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516 FAX (916) 481-4224 E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net 5 Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson 1 2 3 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Johnson Plaintiff, 14 15 vs. 16 Nguyen, et al Defendants 17 18 Case No.2:09-cv-03176-WBS-EFB STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REQUESTING FOR CONTINUANCE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE Pretrial Conference: 7-11-11 Time: 2:00 p.m. Courtroom: 5 19 20 Plaintiff, Scott N. Johnson, and Defendants, hereby 21 stipulate to an extension of time in which to continue the 22 pretrial conference of July 11, 2011. Defendant’s counsel 23 is having a rough time communicating the settlement offer 24 with 25 Plaintiff 26 process of settlement, the parties request a continuance so his clients and due to Defendants, the language Hoanghai barrier. Nguyen are Since in 27 28 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REQUESTING FOR CONTINUANCE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE CIV: S-08-cv-03006-GEB-JFM - 1 the 1 that the matter may be resolved without the need for a 2 pretrial conference. 3 4 5 Dated: July 5, 2011 /s/Scott N. Johnson ____ 6 Scott N. Johnson, 7 Attorney for Plaintiff 8 9 10 11 Dated: July 7, 2011 _/s/ Russell S. Humphrey 12 Russell S. Humphrey, 13 Attorney for Defendant, 14 Hoanghai Nguyen 15 16 17 ORDER 18 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the pretrial conference is 19 20 continued to July 25, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. 21 The trial date of August 23, 2011 shall remain. 22 23 Date: July 7, 2011 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REQUESTING FOR CONTINUANCE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE CIV: S-08-cv-03006-GEB-JFM - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?