Johnson v. Nguyen et al
Filing
48
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 7/7/11: Pretrial Conference RESET for 7/25/2011 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. (Kaminski, H)
4
SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952
DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC.
5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101
PMB #253
CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758
TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516
FAX (916) 481-4224
E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net
5
Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson
1
2
3
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Johnson
Plaintiff,
14
15
vs.
16
Nguyen, et al
Defendants
17
18
Case No.2:09-cv-03176-WBS-EFB
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
REQUESTING FOR CONTINUANCE OF
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
Pretrial Conference: 7-11-11
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Courtroom: 5
19
20
Plaintiff, Scott N. Johnson, and Defendants, hereby
21
stipulate to an extension of time in which to continue the
22
pretrial conference of July 11, 2011. Defendant’s counsel
23
is having a rough time communicating the settlement offer
24
with
25
Plaintiff
26
process of settlement, the parties request a continuance so
his
clients
and
due
to
Defendants,
the
language
Hoanghai
barrier.
Nguyen
are
Since
in
27
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REQUESTING FOR CONTINUANCE OF PRETRIAL
CONFERENCE
CIV: S-08-cv-03006-GEB-JFM - 1
the
1
that the matter may be resolved without the need for a
2
pretrial conference.
3
4
5
Dated:
July 5, 2011
/s/Scott N. Johnson ____
6
Scott N. Johnson,
7
Attorney for Plaintiff
8
9
10
11
Dated:
July 7, 2011
_/s/ Russell S. Humphrey
12
Russell S. Humphrey,
13
Attorney for Defendant,
14
Hoanghai Nguyen
15
16
17
ORDER
18
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the pretrial conference is
19
20
continued to July 25, 2011 at 2:00 p.m.
21
The trial date of
August 23, 2011 shall remain.
22
23
Date:
July 7, 2011
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REQUESTING FOR CONTINUANCE OF PRETRIAL
CONFERENCE
CIV: S-08-cv-03006-GEB-JFM - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?