(PC) Quintana v. Swarthout et al

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/06/11 ordering plaintiff's motion for an extension of time #35 is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff is granted 45 days from the entry of this order in which to file an opposition to the motion to dismiss. Plaintiff's motion to postpone proceedings #34 is denied as moot. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

VICTOR QUINTANA

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. CIV S-09-3221 KJM DAD (TEMP) P

vs.
GARY SWARTHOUT, et al.

14

Defendants.

15

ORDER
/

16

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file an opposition to defendant’s

17

motion to dismiss. The motion will be granted, but not to the extent requested by plaintiff.

18

Plaintiff will have forty-five days from the entry of this order in which to file an opposition to

19

defendant’s pending motion to dismiss. Because plaintiff will receive additional time in which to

20

file an opposition, his previous request to postpone proceedings is rendered moot by this order.

21

/////

22

/////

23

/////

24

/////

25

/////

26

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (Doc. No. 35) is granted part and

3

denied in part. Plaintiff is granted forty-five days from the entry of this order in which to file an

4

opposition to the motion to dismiss.

5
6

2. Plaintiff’s motion to postpone proceedings (Doc. No. 34) is denied as moot.
DATED: July 6, 2011.

7
8
9
10
11

hm
quin3221.36

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2