Phillips v. Fishermon et al

Filing 20

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/28/2010 DENYING, as unnecessary, pltf's 19 motion to proceed IFP and 18 motion to direct the prison to provide pltf w/ his trust acct statment. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
(PC) Phillips v. Fisherman et al Doc. 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. L. FISHERMAN, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's July 13, 2010 motion to proceed in forma pauperis, along with his July 13, 2010 motion requesting that the court direct prison officials to provide him with his trust account statement. On November 20, 2009, the defendants removed this case from the Solano County Superior Court to this court. At that time, the $350 filing fee for this action was paid in full. Accordingly, plaintiff's motions will be denied as unnecessary. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's July 13, 2010 motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 19) is denied as unnecessary; and ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHARLES PHILLIPS, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-3266 GEB DAD P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DAD:sj phil3266.mots 2. Plaintiff's July 13, 2010 motion to direct the prison to provide plaintiff with his trust account statement (Doc. No. 18) is denied as unnecessary. DATED: July 28, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?