Real v. Walker et al

Filing 77

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/05/14 ordering that plaintiff is not required to file an opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss until further order of this court, after counsel has been appointed on plaintiff's behalf. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RANDY REAL,

12
13
14

No. 2:09-cv-3273 GEB KJN P
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

JAMES WALKER, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

On August 22, 2014, this court granted plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel.

18

(ECF No. 75.) Thereafter, on August 29, 2014, defendants filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s

19

Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 76.) Plaintiff is not required to file an opposition to

20

defendants’ motion to dismiss until further order of this court, after counsel has been appointed

21

on plaintiff’s behalf.

22

Dated: September 5, 2014

23
24

/real3273.delay.oppo.

25
26
27
28
1