Real v. Walker et al

Filing 81

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/03/14 ordering for purposes of the court's internal case monitoring procedures only, the clerk o of the court is hereby directed to designate defendants' motion to dismiss 76 effectively re-filed 10/14/14. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RANDY REAL, 12 13 14 No. 2:09-cv-3273 GEB KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JAMES WALKER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On October 14, 2014, this court lifted the temporary stay in this action and appointed 18 counsel for plaintiff. (See ECF No. 80.) The court also set a new briefing schedule on the merits 19 of defendants’ motion to dismiss filed August 29, 2014. For purposes of the court’s internal case- 20 monitoring procedures only, the Clerk of Court is hereby directed to designate defendants’ 21 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 76) effectively “re-filed” on October 14, 2014. 22 23 SO ORDERED. Dated: November 3, 2014 24 25 /real3273.renotice. 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?