Real v. Walker et al

Filing 87

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/21/15 ORDERING that within 30 days of the filing of this order, defendant R. Ramos file and serve an answer.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RANDY REAL, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:09-cv-3273 GEB KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JAMES WALKER, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner in the custody of the California Department of Corrections and 18 Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff 19 challenges his validation as an associate of a prison gang and his resulting confinement in a 20 Security Housing Unit. 21 By order filed January 26, 2015, the court granted in part and denied in part defendants’ 22 motion to dismiss plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 85.) Plaintiff was therein 23 granted leave to file a motion to file a Third Amended Complaint. 24 On February 24, 2015, plaintiff filed a notice with the court, indicating that he would not 25 file a Third Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 86.) Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint 26 therefore remains the operative complaint in this action. Accordingly, it is incumbent upon 27 defendant R. Ramos, the remaining defendant in this action, to file an answer to those portions of 28 plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint that survived the prior motion to dismiss. 1 1 In light of the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the filing 2 of this order, defendant R. Ramos file and serve an answer. 3 Dated: April 21, 2015 4 5 /real3273.file.ans 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?