Burgos v. Cate et al

Filing 36

ORDER ADOPTING 32 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/26/11 and ORDERING that plf's 13 , 14 , 15 , 24 Motions for Preliminary Injunction are DENIED. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD MANUEL BURGOS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. CIV S-09-3276-MCE-CMK-P vs. ORDER MATTHEW L. CATE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 Eastern District of California local rules. 20 On September 2, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 22 objections within a specified time. No timely objections to the findings and recommendations 23 were filed. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. 26 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 2, 2011, are adopted 2. Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunction (Docs. 13, 14, 15, 24) are 3 in full; and 4 5 6 denied. Dated: October 26, 2011 7 8 9 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?