Mayweathers v. Swarthout et al

Filing 38

ORDER adopting in full 36 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/26/11; and defendants' 30 motion for summary judgment is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KARLUK M. MAYWEATHERS, 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. GARY SWARTHOUT, et al., Defendants. 15 16 No. 2:09-cv-3284-LKK-KJN-P ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On July 14, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. On July 19, 2011, 22 plaintiff was re-served with the findings and recommendations at a new address he listed on a 23 notice of change of address filed July 15, 2011. Neither party has filed objections to the findings 24 and recommendations. 25 26 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 1 1 ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 14, 2011, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 30) is denied. 4 DATED: August 26, 2011. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?