General Electric Capital Corporation et al v. Ten Forward Dining, Inc. et al

Filing 145

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/24/2012 ORDERING 143 that each of Equity Lenders' counter-claims against Plaintiffs set forth in its Amended and Supplemental Counterclaims # 129 in the above captioned action are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2). Plaintiffs and Equity Lenders further stipulate and agree that each party shall bear its own costs. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Alison Gutierrez (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) (Nebraska State Bar No. 24025) KUTAK ROCK LLP 1650 Farnam Street Omaha, Nebraska 68102 Telephone: (402) 346-6000 Facsimile: (402) 346-1148 J. David Bournazian (State Bar No.: 186194) KUTAK ROCK LLP Suite 1100 18201 Von Karman Irvine, CA 92612 Telephone: (949) 417-0999 Facsimile: (949) 417-5394 Attorneys for Plaintiffs GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, CEF FUNDING II, L.L.C. and CEF FUNDING V, LLC 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO 16 17 18 19 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION; CEF FUNDING II, L.L.C. and CEF FUNDING V, LLC, 22 23 Assigned to Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez, Ctrm.: 6 Plaintiffs, v. Assigned to Magistrate: Hon. Edmund F. Brennan, Ctrm.: 24 20 21 Case No. 2:09-cv-03296 JAM EFB TEN FORWARD DINING, INC.; ET AL. STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF EQUITY LENDERS LLC’S Defendants. COUNTERCLAIMS AGAINST _______________________________________ PLAINTIFFS AND ORDER EQUITY LENDERS LLC, 24 Counter-Claimant, 25 26 May 16, 2012 9:30 a.m. 6 v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION; ET AL. Date: Time: Ctrm.: 27 Complaint Filed on: November 25, 2009 Counter-Defendants. 28 K UTAK R OCK LLP A TTORN E YS A T L A W IRVINE 2:09-cv-03296-FCD-EFB STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF EQUITY LENDERS, LLC’S COUNTERCLAIMS AGAINST PLAINTIFFS 4848-8016-6673.1 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 1 Consistent with the terms of an executed Settlement Agreement resolving 2 this litigation, Plaintiffs/Counter-claim Defendants General Electric Capital 3 Corporation; CEF Funding II, L.L.C. and CEF Funding V, LLC (collectively 4 “Plaintiffs”), on the one hand, and Defendant/Counter-claimant Equity Lenders 5 LLC (“Equity Lenders”) on the other hand, by and through their respective 6 attorneys of record, HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that each of Equity 7 Lenders’ counter-claims against Plaintiffs set forth in its Amended and 8 Supplemental Counterclaims filed on March 1, 2012 (Doc. No. 129) in the above- 9 captioned action are hereby dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 10 41(a)(2). Plaintiffs and Equity Lenders further stipulate and agree that each party 11 shall bear its own costs. 12 13 SO STIPULATED AND AGREED: Dated: September 21, 2012 KUTAK ROCK LLP 14 15 By: /s/ J. David Bournazian J. David Bournazian Alison M. Gutierrez Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Counter-claim Defendants GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, CEF FUNDING II, L.L.C. and CEF FUNDING V, LLC 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Dated: September 20, 2012 HOLLISTER LAW CORPORATION 23 24 By: /s/ George C. Hollister George C. Hollister Attorney for Defendant/Counterclaimant EQUITY LENDERS LLC 25 26 27 28 K UTAK R OCK LLP A TTORN E YS A T L A W IRVINE -2- 2:09-cv-03296-FCD-EFB STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF EQUITY LENDERS, LLC’S COUNTERCLAIMS AGAINST PLAINTIFFS 4848-8016-6673.1 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 1 2 ORDER 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: __9/24/2012 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________ Hon. John A. Mendez, Judge of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 K UTAK R OCK LLP -3- 2:09-cv-03296-FCD-EFB STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF EQUITY LENDERS, LLC’S COUNTERCLAIMS AGAINST PLAINTIFFS 4848-8016-6673. 1 A TTORN E YS A T L A W IRVINE PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?