General Electric Capital Corporation et al v. Ten Forward Dining, Inc. et al
Filing
145
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/24/2012 ORDERING 143 that each of Equity Lenders' counter-claims against Plaintiffs set forth in its Amended and Supplemental Counterclaims # 129 in the above captioned action are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2). Plaintiffs and Equity Lenders further stipulate and agree that each party shall bear its own costs. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Alison Gutierrez (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
(Nebraska State Bar No. 24025)
KUTAK ROCK LLP
1650 Farnam Street
Omaha, Nebraska 68102
Telephone:
(402) 346-6000
Facsimile:
(402) 346-1148
J. David Bournazian (State Bar No.: 186194)
KUTAK ROCK LLP
Suite 1100
18201 Von Karman
Irvine, CA 92612
Telephone: (949) 417-0999
Facsimile: (949) 417-5394
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL
CORPORATION, CEF FUNDING II, L.L.C.
and CEF FUNDING V, LLC
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO
16
17
18
19
GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL
CORPORATION; CEF FUNDING II,
L.L.C. and CEF FUNDING V, LLC,
22
23
Assigned to Judge:
Hon. John A. Mendez, Ctrm.: 6
Plaintiffs,
v.
Assigned to Magistrate:
Hon. Edmund F. Brennan, Ctrm.: 24
20
21
Case No. 2:09-cv-03296 JAM EFB
TEN FORWARD DINING, INC.; ET AL.
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
EQUITY LENDERS LLC’S
Defendants.
COUNTERCLAIMS AGAINST
_______________________________________ PLAINTIFFS AND ORDER
EQUITY LENDERS LLC,
24
Counter-Claimant,
25
26
May 16, 2012
9:30 a.m.
6
v.
GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL
CORPORATION; ET AL.
Date:
Time:
Ctrm.:
27
Complaint Filed on: November 25,
2009
Counter-Defendants.
28
K UTAK R OCK LLP
A TTORN E YS A T L A W
IRVINE
2:09-cv-03296-FCD-EFB
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF EQUITY LENDERS, LLC’S COUNTERCLAIMS AGAINST PLAINTIFFS
4848-8016-6673.1
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1
Consistent with the terms of an executed Settlement Agreement resolving
2
this litigation, Plaintiffs/Counter-claim Defendants General Electric Capital
3
Corporation; CEF Funding II, L.L.C. and CEF Funding V, LLC (collectively
4
“Plaintiffs”), on the one hand, and Defendant/Counter-claimant Equity Lenders
5
LLC (“Equity Lenders”) on the other hand, by and through their respective
6
attorneys of record, HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that each of Equity
7
Lenders’ counter-claims against Plaintiffs set forth in its Amended and
8
Supplemental Counterclaims filed on March 1, 2012 (Doc. No. 129) in the above-
9
captioned action are hereby dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
10
41(a)(2). Plaintiffs and Equity Lenders further stipulate and agree that each party
11
shall bear its own costs.
12
13
SO STIPULATED AND AGREED:
Dated: September 21, 2012
KUTAK ROCK LLP
14
15
By: /s/ J. David Bournazian
J. David Bournazian
Alison M. Gutierrez
Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Counter-claim
Defendants
GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL
CORPORATION, CEF FUNDING II,
L.L.C. and CEF FUNDING V, LLC
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Dated: September 20, 2012
HOLLISTER LAW CORPORATION
23
24
By: /s/ George C. Hollister
George C. Hollister
Attorney for Defendant/Counterclaimant
EQUITY LENDERS LLC
25
26
27
28
K UTAK R OCK LLP
A TTORN E YS A T L A W
IRVINE
-2-
2:09-cv-03296-FCD-EFB
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF EQUITY LENDERS, LLC’S COUNTERCLAIMS AGAINST PLAINTIFFS
4848-8016-6673.1
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1
2
ORDER
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: __9/24/2012
/s/ John A. Mendez_______________
Hon. John A. Mendez,
Judge of the United States District
Court, Eastern District of California
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
K UTAK R OCK LLP
-3-
2:09-cv-03296-FCD-EFB
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF EQUITY LENDERS, LLC’S COUNTERCLAIMS AGAINST PLAINTIFFS
4848-8016-6673. 1
A TTORN E YS A T L A W
IRVINE
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?