Burris v. County of Placer
Filing
26
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1), signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/4/11. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
BRIGIT S. BARNES & ASSOCIATES, INC.
BRIGIT S. BARNES, ESQ. CSB #122673
ANNIE R. EMBREE, ESQ., OF COUNSEL, CSB #208591
3262 Penryn Road, Suite 200
Loomis, CA 95650
Telephone: (916) 660-9555
Facsimile: (916) 660-9554
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff, MARY MICHELLE BURRIS
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
8
9
10
11
12
MARY MICHELLE BURRIS
Case No.: 2:09-CV-03299-JAM-DAD
Plaintiff,
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND ORDER
(FRCP 42(a)(1)(ii))
v.
13
14
15
COUNTY OF PLACER and DOES 1 through
100, inclusive.
Defendants.
/
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Plaintiff MARY MICHELLE BURRIS and
Defendant COUNTY OF PLACER have reached a settlement of the within action effective July
25, 2011.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this
action through their designated counsel that, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1), the above-captioned
action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice.
DATED: August 3, 2011
BRIGIT S. BARNES & ASSOCIATES, INC.,
A Law Corporation
25
By: ____/S/ - BRIGIT S. BARNES________
Brigit S. Barnes, Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARY MICHELLE BURRIS
26
27
28
Burris/Federal/NoticeofSett.ReqforDismissal
1
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL
1
DATED: August 3, 2011
PLACER COUNTY COUNSEL’S OFFICE
2
3
By:
4
/S/ VALERIE FLOOD
Valerie Flood, Attorneys for COUNTY
OF PLACER
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED:
Dated: August 4, 2011
8
/s/ John A. Mendez________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Burris/Federal/NoticeofSett.ReqforDismissal
2
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?