Andre-Gollihar v. County of San Joaquin, et al

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/11/10 ORDERING that the Proposed FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 4/6/10 6 are ADOPTED; and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice as to Defendants State of California and the California State Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and they are DISMISSED from this action. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 //// 1 On April 6, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: vs. COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, et al., ORDER Defendants. __________________________________/ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SANDRA ANDRE-GOLLIHAR, Plaintiff, No. CIV-S-09-3313-MCE-KJN-PS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 and 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed April 6, 2010, are ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice as to defendants State of California and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and they are dismissed from this action. Dated: May 11, 2010 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?