Insight Glass, Inc. v. Philips Products, et al

Filing 15

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/12/10: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 6/3/2011. Discovery due by 8/5/2011. Dispositive Motions filed by 9/7/2011. Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/18/2011 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. Jury Trial set for 1/9/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KEVIN P. McCARTHY, BAR NO. 199786 MICHAEL S. ELLIS, BAR NO. 199820 McCARTHY & McCARTHY, LLP 505 14th Street, Suite 1150 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 839-8100 Facsimile: (510) 839-8108 E-Mail: kmccarthy@mccarthyllp.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, INSIGHT GLASS, INC., a California Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SACRAMENTO DISTRICT 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff INSIGHT GLASS, INC. and Defendants PHILIPS PRODUCTS, INC. and TOMKINS INDUSTRIES, INC. (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "PARTIES" to this stipulation) hereby stipulate to amend the present Pre-Trial Scheduling Order Court and propose the following schedule: 1. The PARTIES to this stipulation shall make expert witness disclosures under ) Case No.: 2:09-CV-03370-JAM (EFB) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: PREPlaintiff, ) TRIAL SCHEDULING ) v. ) PHILIPS PRODUCTS; PHILIPS PRODUCTS, ) ) INC.; PHILIPS INDUSTRIES; PHILIPS ) INDUSTRIES, INC.; TOMKINS, PLC; ) TOMKINS CORPORATION; TOMKINS ) INDUSTRIES, INC.; TOMKINS ) ACQUISITION CORPORATION; DOES 1) 100, inclusive, ) Defendants. ) ) INSIGHT GLASS, INC., a California Corporation Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2) by June 3, 2011; -1 - PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com STIPULATION AND ORDER RE PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2011; 2. Supplemental disclosures and disclosures of any rebuttal experts under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2)(c) shall be made by the PARTIES to this stipulation by June 17, 2011; 3. Discovery shall be completed by the PARTIES to this stipulation on or before August 5, 2011; 4. The PARTIES to this stipulation shall file their dispositive motions by September 7, 5. 6. All dispositive motions shall be heard on or before October 5, 2011 at 9:30 a.m.; The Joint Pre-Trial Statement shall be filed and served by the PARTIES to this stipulation on November 10, 2011. At the time of filing of the Joint Pre-Trial Statement, the statement shall e-mail the Joint Pre-Trial Statement in WPD or WORD format to Judge Mendez' assistant, Jane Pratt at: jpratt@caed.uscourts.gov; 7. 8. The Pre-Trial Conference shall take place on November 18, 2011, at 3:00 p.m.; and Jury trial in this matter is set for January 9, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. The PARTIES to this stipulation estimate a trial length of approximately 10 to 20 days. This Stipulation and Order Re: Pre-Trial Scheduling is submitted for the purpose of memorializing the stipulated parties' agreement to modify the existing discovery and trial schedule only, and does not alter any other terms or orders contained in the Court's January 29, 2010 Status (Pre-Trial Scheduling) Order. IT IS SO STIPULATED: DATED: November ___, 2010 MCCARTHY & MCCARTHY LLP J. FRED TRUDEAU Attorneys for Plaintiff INSIGHT GLASS, INC. -2 - PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com STIPULATION AND ORDER RE PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DATED: November ___, 2010 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH, LLP SASHA M. CUMMINGS GINA M. GUILEY Attorneys for Defendant PHILIPS PRODUCTS, INC. DATED: November ___, 2010 ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY JOHN A. KOEPPEL TERRY ANASTASSIOU Attorneys for Defendant TOMKINS INDUSTRIES, INC. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 12, 2010 /s/ John A. Mendez_____________ HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE -3 - PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com STIPULATION AND ORDER RE PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?