Insight Glass, Inc. v. Philips Products, et al

Filing 39

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/10/13 CONTINUING Jury Trial to 4/28/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Manzer, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

KEVIN P. McCARTHY, BAR NO. 144227
McCARTHY & McCARTHY, LLP
The Arlington Building
492 Ninth Street, Suite 220
Oakland, California 94607
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorney for Plaintiff
INSIGHT GLASS, INC., a California Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SACRAMENTO DISTRICT

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

INSIGHT GLASS, INC., a California
Corporation

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
PHILIPS PRODUCTS; PHILIPS
)
PRODUCTS, INC.; PHILIPS INDUSTRIES; )
PHILIPS INDUSTRIES, INC.; TOMKINS, )
PLC; TOMKINS CORPORATION;
)
TOMKINS INDUSTRIES, INC.; TOMKINS )
ACQUISITION CORPORATION; DOES 1- )
100, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

Case No.: 2:09-CV-03370-JAM (EFB)

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE TRIAL DATE

Trial
Date: September 16, 2013
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Dept.: 6

20
21

At the request of Plaintiff, INSIGHT GLASS, INC. (“INSIGHT”), INSIGHT and

22

PHILIPS PRODUCTS, INC. (“PHILIPS”) hereby stipulate to a further continuance of the

23

current September 16, 2013 trial date. This stipulation is based on a stated conflict by

24

counsel for INSIGHT. Specifically, counsel for INSIGHT represents that he has several

25

cases scheduled for trial, on or near, the current September 16, 2013 trial date.

26
McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP
The Arlington Building
492 Ninth Street, Suite 220
Oakland, CA 94607
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Accordingly, INSIGHT and PHILIPS stipulate to continue the current trial date until

•1•

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE

1

April 28, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6, a date identified by the Court.

2

It is further stipulated that the Court’s prior Order, issued on April 8, 2013,

3

re-opening written, non-expert discovery for the limited purpose of Plaintiff’s response to

4

limited written discovery propounded by Defendant on the insurance issues raised by

5

Plaintiff remains in effect.

6
7

IT IS SO STIPULATED:
DATED: April 10, 2013

McCARTHY & McCARTHY LLP

8
__/s/ Kevin P. McCarthy, Esq._______
KEVIN P. McCARTHY
Attorney for Plaintiff
INSIGHT GLASS, INC.

9
10
11
DATED: April 10, 2013

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

12
__/s/ Scott M. Mackey, Esq._________
SASHA M. CUMMINGS
SCOTT M. MACKEY
Attorneys for Defendant
PHILIPS PRODUCTS, INC.

13
14
15
16

The current Trial date of September 16, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 is
17
continued to April 28, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6.
18
It is further ordered that the Court’s prior Order, issued on April 8, 2013, re-opening
19
written, non-expert discovery for the limited purpose of Plaintiff’s response to limited
20
written discovery propounded by Defendant on the insurance issues raised by Plaintiff
21
remains in effect.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
DATED: April 10, 2013
24
25

/s/ John A. Mendez______________
HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ

26
McCarthy & McCarthy, LLP
The Arlington Building
492 Ninth Street, Suite 220
Oakland, CA 94607
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

•2•

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE