Alcala v. Martel

Filing 92

ORDER granting 88 Motion for Extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 12/6/12: Defendants' reply filed November 20, 2012 is deemed timely. Plaintiff's November 26, 2012 motion to appoint counsel 91 is DENIED. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

JOSEPH G. ALCALA,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:09-cv-3407 KJM JFM P

vs.
MIKE MARTEL, Warden, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
/

Plaintiff is a prison inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil

17

rights action. On November 13, 2012, defendants filed a motion for an extension of time to file a

18

reply to their motion for summary judgment. Good cause appearing, the motion will be granted

19

and defendants’ reply filed November 20, 2012 will be deemed timely filed.

20

Furthermore, on November 26, 2012, plaintiff filed his third request for the

21

appointment of counsel. Plaintiff's previous requests were filed on November 16, 2010 and

22

December 19, 2011. All requests were denied. In light of those orders, plaintiff’s third request

23

for the appointment of counsel will also be denied.

24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

25

1. Defendants’ motion for an extension of time to file a reply to their motion for

26

summary judgment (Dkt. No. 88.) is GRANTED. Defendants’ reply filed November 20, 2012 is
1

1

deemed timely;
2. Plaintiff’s November 26, 2012 motion to appoint counsel (Dkt. No. 91.) is

2
3

DENIED.

4

DATED: December 6, 2012.

5
6
7
8
9

14
alca3407.31thr

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2