Tracey v. Sacto. Co. Sheriff Dept. Medical Dept.
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/2/2010 ORDERING that pltf's 2 application to proceed IFP is DENIED w/out prejudice; pltf to submit, w/in 30 days, a new ifp application and a certified inmate trust acct statement; the clerk to send pltf a new ifp form.(Yin, K)
(PC) Tracey v. Sacto. Co. Sheriff Dept. Medical Dept.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff, an inmate at the Rio Cosumnes Correctional Center proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Upon review of the in forma pauperis application, the court finds that it is incomplete. Plaintiff did not have the certificate portion of the application completed by an authorized official, and plaintiff did not submit a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Plaintiff will be provided an opportunity to submit a new application and a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement. ///// ///// ///// 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DAVID BRUCE TRACEY, Plaintiff, vs. SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF DEP'T MEDICAL DEP'T, et al., Defendants. / No. CIV S-09-3415 LKK DAD P
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's December 8, 2009 application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) is denied without prejudice. 2. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a new application to proceed in forma pauperis and a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to provide plaintiff a copy of the court's in forma pauperis application for a prisoner; and 4. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. DATED: August 2, 2010.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?