Tracey v. Sacto. Co. Sheriff Dept. Medical Dept.

Filing 8

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/08/10 recommending that this action be dismissed due to plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

(PC) Tracey v. Sacto. Co. Sheriff Dept. Medical Dept.

Doc. 8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 / A recent court order was served on plaintiff's address of record and returned by the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed due to plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 182(f) and 110. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DAVID BRUCE TRACEY, Plaintiff, vs. SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT. MEDICAL DEPT., et al., FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS No. CIV S-09-3415 LKK DAD P

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: September 8, 2010.

DAD:kly trac3415.33a

2