Speck v. Shasta County Sheriff Department et al

Filing 43

ORDER ADOPTING 39 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/1/2014. This action shall proceed solely on Fourth Claim for relief. The matter is REMANDED to Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for screening of plaintiff's 3/12/2014 41 Second Amended Complaint. (Marciel, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

COREY SPECK,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:09-cv-3440-TLN-EFB P
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

SHASTA COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
18
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On February 11, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 11, 2014, are adopted in full;

3

2. This action shall proceed solely on the Fourth claim for relief; and

4

3. The matter is remanded to the magistrate judge for screening of plaintiff’s March 12,

5
6
7

2014 second amended complaint.
So ordered.
Dated: April 1, 2014

8
9
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2