Clarke v. Lindeman, et al

Filing 7

STIPULATION and ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/11/10. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading on or before 2/24//10.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

1 R. Bradford Huss, No. 71303 Robert F. Schwartz, No. 227327 2 Michelle L. Schuller, No. 255787 TRUCKER ö HUSS 3 A Professional Corporation 100 Montgomery Street, 23rd Floor 4 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 5 E-mail: [e-mail] [e-mail] 6 [e-mail] 7 Attorneys for Defendants DAVID NICKUM, 8 VALLEY AGGREGATE TRANSPORT, INC., and ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE 9 FOR THE VALLEY AGGREGATE, INC., EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN 10 11 Trucker ö Huss A Professional Corporation 100 Montgomery Street, 23rd Floor San Francisco, California 94104 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 v. MICHAEL LINDEMAN, LORRAINE LINDEMAN, DAVID NICKUM, VALLEY AGGREGATE TRANSPORT, INC., and ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE FOR THE VALLEY AGGREGATE, INC., EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN, Defendants. Defendants MICHAEL LINDEMAN, LORRAINE LINDEMAN, DAVID NICKUM, EDWARD CLARKE, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION Case No. 09-cv-03467-JAM-DAD STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

23 VALLEY AGGREGATE TRANSPORT, INC., and ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE FOR 24 THE VALLEY AGGREGATE, INC., EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN ("Defendants") 25 and Plaintiff EDWARD CLARKE ("Plaintiff") hereby stipulate, by and through their respective 26 counsel, to extend the time by which all Defendants must file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's 27 Complaint. Pursuant to this stipulation, Defendants shall file a responsive pleading on or before 28 February 24, 2010.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT;

1

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case No. 09-cv-03467-JAM-DAD #1058461

1

This extension will not alter any dates or deadlines set by Court order. TRUCKER ö HUSS By: /s/R. Bradford Huss R. Bradford Huss Attorneys for Defendants David Nickum, Valley Aggregate Transport, Inc., and Administration Committee for the Valley Aggregate, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan DATED: February 10, 2010 MCDONOUGH HOLLAND & ALLEN P.C. By: /s/Zachary Smith (as authorized on 2-10-2010) Zachary Smith Robert Rubin Attorneys for Defendants Michael Lindeman and Lorraine Lindeman

2 DATED: February 10, 2010 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Trucker ö Huss A Professional Corporation 100 Montgomery Street, 23rd Floor San Francisco, California 94104 12 13 DATED: February 10, 2010 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER & JACKSON, P.C. By: /s/Daniel Feinberg (as authorized on 2-9-2010) Daniel Feinberg Attorneys for Plaintiff Edward Clarke

ORDER Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 11, 2010

/s/ John A. Mendez_______ Honorable John A. Mendez U.S. District Court Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT;

2

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case No. 09-cv-03467-JAM-DAD #1058461