Avent v. Cate et al
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/23/10 ORDERING that dft's 14 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED; dft L. Leslane shall file a responsive pleading to plf's complaint w/i 30 days. (Benson, A.)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:sj aven2482.36
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RUFUS A. AVENT, Plaintiff, vs. M. CATE et al., Defendants. / Defendant L. Leslane has requested a thirty-day extension of time to serve a responsive pleading to plaintiff's complaint. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant L. Leslane's June 21, 2010 request for an extension of time (Doc. No. 14) is granted; and 2. Defendant L. Leslane shall file and serve a responsive pleading to plaintiff's complaint within thirty days of the date of this order. DATED: June 23, 2010. ORDER No. CIV S-09-3482 JAM DAD P
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
