Sardella-Lagomarsino v. Swarthout
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/3/2011 DENYING ptnr's 22 request for appointment of counsel; ptnr is ADVISED that the court will disregard, and issue no response to, any future filings in this closed case. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
MARC SARDELLA-LAGOMARSINO,
11
Petitioner,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:09-cv-3498 GEB KJN P
vs.
GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden,
Respondent.
ORDER
/
On April 29, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of counsel. This
17
action was closed by this court on March 31, 2011, when petitioner’s application for a writ of
18
habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, was denied, and judgment was entered accordingly.
19
Petitioner is now pursuing an appeal before the Ninth Circuit United States Court of Appeals, but
20
has directed the instant motion to this court.
21
There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas
22
proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). While 18 U.S.C.
23
§ 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case “if the interests of justice
24
so require,” see Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases, the court does not find that the
25
interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel in this case at this time. Not
26
only has this court rendered a final decision adverse to petitioner, but the court declined to issue
1
1
the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s April 29, 2011 request
3
for appointment of counsel is denied. Petitioner is advised that the court will disregard, and issue
4
no response to, any future filings in this closed case.
5
6
SO ORDERED.
DATED: May 3, 2011
7
8
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
sard3498.clsd.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?