Pina v. Jacquez

Filing 23

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 08/25/10 ordering by the order filed on 08/02/10, petitioner's request for a further extension of time to file his opposition to respondent's motion to dismiss was denied without prejud ice to his filing his opposition and showing good cause for the delay within 14 days. Petitioner's filing of 08/16/10, is sufficient to show good cause for the delay, and the 07/28/10 opposition filed by petitioner is deemed timely filed. Respondent has previously been granted until 09/11/10, to file a reply to petitioner's opposition and that deadline remains in effect. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
(HC) Pina v. Jacquez Doc. 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 GGH:009 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DANIEL PINA, Petitioner, vs. FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, Respondent. / By Order, filed on August 2, 2010, petitioner's request for a further extension of time to file his opposition to respondent's motion to dismiss was denied without prejudice to his filing his opposition and showing good cause for the delay within fourteen days. Petitioner's filing of August 16, 2010, is sufficient to show good cause for the delay, and the July 28, 2010, opposition filed by petitioner is deemed timely filed. Respondent has previously been granted until September 11, 2010, to file a reply to petitioner's opposition, and that deadline remains in effect. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 25, 2010 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE pina3523.ord2 No. CIV S-09-3523 MCE GGH P ORDER 26 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?