Cheung v. Sisto

Filing 22

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/18/11 ordering that this action is dismissed without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

FRANK CHEUNG,
Petitioner,

11
12
13

No. CIV S-09-3535 KJM DAD P

vs.
D.K. SISTO, Warden,
Respondent.

14

ORDER
/

15

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has requested that this action be

16
17

dismissed. On July 6, 2011, respondent was granted ten days in which to file any objection to

18

petitioner’s request. That time has now passed and respondent has not objected to the requested

19

dismissal. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without

20

prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a); see also Rule 11, Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under

21

Section 2254.

22

DATED: July 18, 2011.

23
24
25

DAD:8
cheung3535.159

26
1