Chepel, et al v. Cohen, et al

Filing 7

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 05/21/10 ADOPTING 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; DISMISSING without prejudice minor plaintiffs Erik Chepel Jason Chepel, Ashley Chepel and guardian ad litem Roof Vera Chepel. (Williams, D)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Plaintiffs, 13 vs. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Defendants. __________________________________/ On April 19, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 1 THE LAW OFFICE OF FREDERICK S. COHEN; FREDERICK S. COHEN, individually; MARY ROSS; DR. LARRY NICHOLAS; and DOES 1 through 20, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IGOR CHEPEL; ROOF VERA CHEPEL, as guardian ad litem for minors, ERICK CHEPEL, JASON CHEPEL, and ASHLEY CHEPEL,

No. CIV-S-09-3548-JAM-KJN-PS

ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed April 19, 2010, are ADOPTED; 2. Minor plaintiffs Erick Chepel, Jason Chepel, and Ashley Chepel are dismissed from this action without prejudice; and 3. Plaintiff Roof Vera Chepel, as guardian ad litem for the three minor plaintiffs, is dismissed from this action without prejudice. DATED: May 21, 2010 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2