Foss v. Martell

Filing 82

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/5/12 ORDERING that, upon reconsideration, the order of the Magistrate Judge filed 11/14/12 is AFFIRMED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

RAYMOND CHRISTIAN FOSS,

10
11

Petitioner,

No. 2:09-cv-3551-JAM-JFM (HC)

vs.

12

MIKE MARTEL, Warden,

13

Respondent.

14

ORDER
/

15

On November 25, 2011, petitioner filed a motion for de novo review, which the

16

court construes as a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order filed November

17

14, 2011. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless

18

“clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does

19

not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

20

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

21

magistrate judge filed November 14, 2011 is affirmed.

22

DATED: March 5, 2012

23
24

/s/ John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

25
26
1