Lollis v. Haviland
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/26/10 ORDERING that parties are to submit, within 30 days, additional briefing to address Respondent's claim that the "some evidence standard" does not apply to Petitioner's claim. (Owen, K)
(HC) Lollis v. Haviland
Doc. 22
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ----oo0oo---Petitioner, a pro se state prisoner, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate v. J.W. HAVILAND, et al. Respondents. KEITH LOLLIS, Petitioner, ORDER No. 2:09-cv-03558-MCE-GGH UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and E.D. Cal. Local Rule 302. The Court is in receipt of Magistrate Judge Hollow's Findings and Recommendations regarding Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (ECF. No. 11). /// /// /// 1
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
In light of the decision in Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546 (9th Cir. 2010), this Court requests additional briefing by both parties to address Respondent's claim that the "some evidence standard" does not apply to Petitioner's claim. Such briefs are
to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date that this order is electronically filed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 26, 2010
_____________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?