Salazar v. Cate

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/2/2010 ORDERING that the 15 order to show cause is DISCHARGED; ptnr has 28 days to respond to the 14 motion to dismiss; and the clerk to send ptnr a copy of 14 motion to dismiss. (Yin, K)

(HC) Salazar v. Cate

Doc. 17

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 dismiss; and \\\\\ \\\\\ \\\\\ 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOSE ESCOBEDO SALAZAR, Petitioner, vs. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Respondents. / Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On August 4, 2010, this court ordered petitioner to show cause why respondent's motion to dismiss should not be granted. On August 20, 2010, petitioner declared in his response that he never received respondent's motion to dismiss. Based on petitioner's declaration, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The order to show cause is discharged; 2. Petitioner has 28 days from the service of this order to respond to the motion to ORDER No. CIV S-09-3585 LKK GGH P

1 2 3 4

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of Doc. No. 14 enclosed with this order. DATED: September 2, 2010 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

G G H :0 0 1 4 s a la 3 5 8 5 . o r d

2