Alfaro v. Marin

Filing 5

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/23/10 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. LETICIA MARIN, Defendant. / By order filed January 8, 2010, plaintiff was ordered to either submit a completed application and affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis, or the appropriate filing fee. Plaintiff has not filed a completed application and affidavit, or the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 1 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS MIKA ALFARO, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-3595 FCD KJM PS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: February 23, 2010.
alfa3595.fifp

2