Doe v. Biotronik, Inc.

Filing 146

STIPULATED ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/10/2015 regarding confidentiality of discovery material and non-waiver of attorney-client privilege and work product protection. (Zignago, K.)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

) CASE NO. 2:09 – CV 03617 KJM EFB
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; THE
)
STATES OF ARKANSAS, CALIFORNIA,
DELAWARE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ) Assigned to Kimberly J. Mueller
FLORIDA, GEORGIA, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, )
)
INDIANA, LOUISIANA, MICHIGAN,
MASSACHUSETTS, MONTANA, NEVADA, )
)
NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW JERSEY, NEW
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER
)
MEXICO, NEW YORK, OKLAHOMA,
REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY
)
RHODE ISLAND, TENNESSEE, TEXAS,
OF DISCOVERY MATERIAL AND
)
VIRGINIA, AND WISCONSIN, ex rel.
NON-WAIVER OF ATTORNEY)
BRIAN SANT, RELATOR,
CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND WORK
)
PRODUCT PROTECTION
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
BIOTRONIK, INC. and WESTERN
)
MEDICAL, INC.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
Whereas, the parties have stipulated that certain discovery material be treated as confidential

18 and that certain provisions of Fed. R. Evid. 502 be incorporated in an order; Accordingly, it is this
19 ____ day of ________________, ____, by the United States District Court for the Eastern District
2015
10th
April
20 of California, ORDERED:
21
1.

Designation of Discovery Materials as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY-

22
23

CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” All documents produced in the course of

24 discovery by any party or non-party (hereinafter the "Producing Party"), including all written,
25 recorded, graphic or electronically-stored matters (and all identical and non-identical copies
26 thereof); all Answers to Interrogatories; all Answers to Requests for Admission; all Responses to
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY OF DISCOVERY MATERIAL AND
NON-WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION

1
2

Requests for Production of Documents; and all deposition testimony and deposition exhibits
(collectively, the “Discovery Materials”) shall be subject to this Order, as set forth below:

3

(a)

4

made by placing or affixing on the document, in a manner which will not interfere with its

5

legibility, the word “CONFIDENTIAL.” The Producing Party may only designate material

6

Confidential Information. The designation of confidential information shall be

as "CONFIDENTIAL” when the Producing Party in good faith believes it contains sensitive

7
8
9

personal or business information, trade secrets, or other confidential research, development,
or commercial information, which is in fact confidential.

10

(b)

11

information shall be made by placing or affixing on the document, in a manner which will

12

not interfere with its legibility, the words “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’

13
14

EYES

Highly-Confidential Information.

ONLY.”

A

Producing

Party

The designation of highly confidential

may

designate

material

as

“HIGHLY

CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only when the Producing Party in good

15
16

faith believes:

17

(i)

18

pricing information; or c) proprietary technical information, such as design

19

specifications; and/or

20

(ii)

21

Such material contains either a) customer or subscriber data and analysis; b)

The disclosure of such material would create a substantial risk of serious

competitive injury to the Producing Party or a non-party.

22
(c)

Designation.

A Producing Party shall not routinely designate material as

23
24

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or

25

make such designations without reasonable inquiry to determine whether it qualifies for

26

such

27

CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information shall be made prior to, or

designation.

The

designation

of

“CONFIDENTIAL”

OR

“HIGHLY

28
2
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY OF DISCOVERY MATERIAL AND
NON-WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION

1

contemporaneously with, the production or disclosure of that information. If Discovery

2

Materials claimed to be “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” are produced without such

3

designation, the Producing Party may request in writing that such Discovery Materials and

4

all copies thereof be stamped “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential.” The receiving party

5

must comply with the request within five (5) business days of receiving the request and will

6

use reasonable efforts to retrieve any copies of documents that may have been disseminated

7
8
9

prior to receiving the request. The receiving party may challenge the designation of the
documents as provided in this Order, but the inadvertent production of Discovery Materials

10

(including, without limitation, testimony) claimed to be “Confidential” or “Highly

11

Confidential” without that designation shall not constitute a waiver of confidentiality.

12

(d)

13
14

Designation Related to Depositions. Portions of depositions of a party or non-

party's present and former officers, directors, employees, agents, experts, and representatives
shall be deemed confidential or highly confidential only if they are designated as such when

15
16

the deposition is taken or within seven business days after receipt of the transcript. Any

17

testimony that describes a document that has been designated as “CONFIDENTIAL or

18

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” as described above, shall also

19

be deemed to be designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-

20

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” No person shall be present during any portion of any

21

deposition designated “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” unless that person is an

22
authorized recipient of Discovery

Materials containing such Confidential or Highly

23
24

Confidential information under the terms of this Order.

25

(e)

Limitations on Use. Discovery Materials that have been provided (before or after

26

entry of this Order) in discovery in the above-captioned litigation ("this litigation") and that

27

have

been

designated

as

“CONFIDENTIAL

or

“HIGHLY

CONFIDENTIAL-

28
3
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY OF DISCOVERY MATERIAL AND
NON-WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION

1

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” shall be used or disclosed solely for the purpose of the

2

prosecution or defense of this litigation, including preparing for and conducting pre-trial,

3

trial and post-trial proceedings in this litigation, and for no other purpose. These materials

4

shall not be used or disclosed for any business, commercial or competitive purpose and shall

5

not be used or disclosed in connection with any other litigation or proceeding.

6

(f)

Permissible Disclosures of "Confidential" Information.

The parties and the

7
8
9

parties' outside counsel (hereinafter "Outside Counsel") shall not disclose or permit the
disclosure of any Discovery Materials designated as “CONFIDENTIAL" under this Order

10

to any other person or entity, except that disclosures may be made in the following

11

circumstances:

12
13
14

(i)

Disclosure may be made to employees of Outside Counsel.

Any such

employee to whom such disclosure is made shall be provided with a copy of, and
become subject to, the provisions of this Order requiring that the Discovery

15
16

Materials be held in confidence.

17

(ii)

18

provide assistance in the conduct of the litigation in which the information was

19

disclosed. Disclosure may also be made to any employee of a party who is deposed

20

or who testifies at trial.

21

(iii)

Disclosure may be made to employees of a party required in good faith to

Disclosure may be made to a third-party deponent or third-party trial witness

22
who is the author, addressee, or recipient of a document. Disclosure may also be

23
24

made to the corporate designee for the entity that employed such author, addressee,

25

or recipient at the time of the document's creation or transmission.

26

(iv)

Disclosure may be made to court reporters engaged for depositions.

27
28
4
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY OF DISCOVERY MATERIAL AND
NON-WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION

(v)

1

Disclosure may be made to any litigation support service companies

2

specifically engaged by Outside Counsel for the limited purpose of assisting in the

3

processing or production of electronically-stored information or in making

4

photocopies of documents. Outside Counsel must take reasonable steps to ensure

5

that the confidentiality of such documents is maintained by such litigation support

6

service companies.

7
(vi)

8

Disclosure may be made to consultants, investigators, or experts (hereinafter

referred to collectively as “experts”) retained by Outside Counsel to assist in the

9
10

preparation and trial of the lawsuit. Prior to disclosure to any expert, the expert must

11

be informed of and agree in writing to be subject to the provisions of this Order

12

requiring that the documents and information be held in confidence.

13
14

(g)

Upon receiving Discovery Materials designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY," Outside Counsel shall not disclose or permit the disclosure

15
16
17

of any of these Discovery Materials to any other person or entity, except that disclosures
may be made in the following circumstances:

18

(i)

19

employee to whom Outside Counsel makes a disclosure shall be provided with a

20

copy of, and become subject to, the provisions of this Order requiring that the

21

Disclosure may be made to employees of Outside Counsel.

Any such

Discovery Materials be held in confidence.

22
(ii)

Disclosure may be made to a deponent or trial witness who is the author,

23
24

addressee, or recipient of the document.

25

(iii)

Disclosure may be made to a corporate designee for the Producing Party that

26

designated

27

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY."

the

Discovery

Material

as

“HIGHLY

CONFIDENTIAL

–

28
5
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY OF DISCOVERY MATERIAL AND
NON-WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION

(iv)

1

Disclosure may be made to court reporters engaged for depositions. Prior to

2

disclosing any Discovery Materials designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –

3

ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY" to any such court reporter, such person must agree to

4

be bound by the terms of this Order.

5

(v)

6

Disclosure may be made to any litigation support service companies

specifically engaged by Outside Counsel for the limited purpose of assisting in the

7
processing or production of electronically-stored information or in making

8

photocopies of documents. Prior to disclosure of Discovery Materials designated as

9
10

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY" to any such litigation

11

support service companies, such company must agree to be bound by the terms of

12

this Order.

13

(vi)

14

Disclosure may be made to experts retained by Outside Counsel to whom it is

necessary that “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”

15
materials be shown for the sole purpose of assisting in, or consulting with respect to,

16
17

this litigation. Prior to disclosure to any expert, the expert must be informed of and

18

agree in writing to be subject to the provisions of this Order requiring that the

19

documents and information be held in confidence;

20

(vii)

21

Disclosure may be made to other persons only upon written consent of the

producing or designating person (which agreement may be recorded in a deposition

22
or other transcript) or upon order of the Court after affording the producing person

23
due notice and an opportunity to be heard.

24
25

(h)

Except as provided in subparagraphs (f) and (g) above, counsel for the parties shall

26

keep

all

27

CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY" that are received under this Order

Discovery

Materials

designated

as

"CONFIDENTIAL"

or

"HIGHLY

28
6
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY OF DISCOVERY MATERIAL AND
NON-WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION

1

secure within their exclusive possession and shall take reasonable efforts to place such

2

documents in a secure area.

3

(i)

4

collectively as “copies”) of Discovery Materials designated as confidential under this Order

5

or any portion thereof, shall be immediately affixed with the words “CONFIDENTIAL” or

6

All copies, duplicates, extracts, summaries, or descriptions (hereinafter referred to

“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” if those words do not already

7
8
9

appear.
2.

Nothing contained in this Confidentiality Order shall preclude any party from

10 redacting information that is irrelevant to the prosecution or defense of this litigation, and each
11 party expressly reserves the right to redact any such irrelevant information from the Discovery
12 Materials produced in this litigation.
13
3.
Confidential and/or Highly Confidential Information Filed with Court. To the
14

extent that any Discovery Materials subject to this Confidentiality Order (or any pleading, motion

15
16

or memorandum disclosing them) are proposed to be filed or are filed with the Court, those

17 materials and papers, or any portion thereof which discloses confidential information, shall be filed
18 in accordance with Local Rules 141.1(e) and 141. Defendant will have the burden of filing a
19 motion for a sealing order to seal any material it identifies as confidential. Any motion for a sealing
20 order must be directed to the assigned district judge.
21
4.

Party Seeking Greater Protection Must Obtain Further Order. No information

22
may be withheld from discovery on the ground that the material to be disclosed requires protection

23
24

greater than that afforded by paragraph (1) of this Order unless the party claiming a need for greater

25 protection moves for an order providing such special protection pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c).
26

5.

Challenging Designation of Confidentiality. A designation of “CONFIDENTIAL”

27 or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” may be challenged upon motion
28
7
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY OF DISCOVERY MATERIAL AND
NON-WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION

1

by the party challenging such designation. In this regard, defendant will be filing a motion for a

2

sealing order before the assigned district judge. In this context, the parties will be arguing whether

3

documents labeled as confidential satisfy the standard articulated in Press-Enterprise Co. v.

4

Superior Court of Cal., 464 U.S. 501 (1984). So as not to render moot issues that are in dispute in

5

that motion, the parties shall, pending a ruling on that motion, comply with this order regarding

6

disclosure of information designated as confidential.

7
8
9

6.

Return of Confidential Material at Conclusion of Litigation. At the conclusion

of the litigation, all material treated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-

10 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” under this Order and not received in evidence shall be returned to
11 the originating party. If the parties so stipulate, the material may be destroyed instead of being
12 returned. The Clerk of the Court may return to counsel for the parties, or destroy, any sealed
13 material at the end of the litigation, including any appeals.
14

7.

Non-waiver of attorney-client privilege and work product protection.

The

15
16

parties have stipulated that, pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 502(d) and (e), the disclosure during

17 discovery of any communication or information (hereinafter “Document”) that is protected by the
18 attorney–client privilege (“Privilege” or “Privileged,” as the case may be) or work-product
19 protection (“Protection” or “Protected,” as the case may be), as defined by Fed. R. Evid. 502(g),
20 shall not waive the Privilege or Protection in the above-captioned case, or any other federal or state
21
proceeding, for either that Document or the subject matter of that Document, unless there is an

22
intentional waiver of the Privilege or Protection in order to support an affirmative use of the

23
24

Document in support of the party’s claim or defense, in which event the scope of any such waiver

25 shall be determined by Fed. R. Evid. 502(a)(2) and (3). The parties intend that this stipulation shall
26 displace the provisions of Fed. R. Evid. 502(b)(1) and (2). That is, all disclosures not made in order
27 to support an affirmative use of the Document in support of the party’s claim or defense shall be
28
8
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY OF DISCOVERY MATERIAL AND
NON-WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION

1
2
3

regarded as “inadvertent,” and the producing party is hereby deemed to have taken “reasonable
steps to prevent disclosure,” regardless of any argument or circumstances suggesting otherwise.
8.

Return of Privileged or Protected materials. Except when the requesting party

4

contests the validity of the underlying claim of Privilege or Protection (including a challenge to the

5

reasonableness of the timing or substance of the measures undertaken by the producing party to

6

retrieve the Document(s) in question), any Document(s) the Producing Party claims as Privileged or

7
8
9
10

Protected shall, upon written request, promptly be returned to the Producing Party and/or destroyed,
at the Producing Party’s option.
If the underlying claim of Privilege or Protection is contested, the requesting party shall

11 comply with, and may promptly seek a judicial determination of the matter pursuant to, Fed. R. Civ.
12 P. 26(b)(5)(B). In assessing the validity of any claim of Privilege or Protection, the court shall not
13 consider the provisions of Fed. R. Evid. 502(b)(1) and (2), but shall consider whether timely and
14

otherwise reasonable steps were taken by the Producing Party to request the return or destruction of

15
16

the Document once the Producing Party had actual knowledge of (i) the circumstances giving rise to

17 the claim of Privilege or Protection and (ii) the production of the Document in question including, if
18 applicable, compliance with the last sentence of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5)(B).
19

(a)

20

shredded, that active electronic versions are deleted, and that no effort shall be made to

21

For purposes of paragraph 8, “destroyed” shall mean that the paper versions are

recover versions that are not readily accessible, such as those on backup media or only

22
recoverable through forensic means.

23
24

(b)

For purposes of paragraph 8, “actual knowledge” refers to the actual knowledge of

25

an attorney of record or other attorney with lead responsibilities in the litigation (for

26

example, lead counsel, trial counsel, or a senior attorney with managerial responsibilities for

27

the litigation).

28
9
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY OF DISCOVERY MATERIAL AND
NON-WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION

1

9.

The terms of this Order shall apply to all manner and means of discovery. The

2

provisions of this Order may be modified at any time by stipulation of the parties, approved by

3

order of the Court. In addition, a party may at any time apply to the Court for modification of this

4

Order. Nothing in this Order shall constitute (a) any agreement to produce in discovery any

5

testimony, document or other information; (b) a waiver of any right to object to or seek a further

6

protective order with respect to any discovery or other matter in this or any other litigation; or (c) a

7
8
9
10

waiver of any claim or immunity, protection, or privilege with respect to any testimony, document
or information.
10.

This Order shall remain in force and effect until modified, superseded or terminated

11 by agreement of the parties hereto or by order of the Court. The termination of this action shall not
12 relieve the parties from complying with any limitations imposed by this Order, and the Court shall
13 retain jurisdiction to enforce this Order.
14
15
16

Dated: March __, 2015

17 /s/ Christopher Myers
18 HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

19
20
21
22
23
24

Christopher A. Myers (Pro Hac Vice)
Vince Farhat (State Bar No. 183794)
Cheryl A. Feeley (Pro Hac Vice)
400 South Hope Street, 8th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071-2040
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant Biotronik, Inc.

Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Jeremy L. Friedman
Jeremy L. Friedman, Attorney at Law
(State Bar No. 142659)
2801 Sylhowe Road
Oakland, CA 94602
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Fees Counsel for relator/Mychal Wilson
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

25 /s/ Audra Ibarra

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

LAW OFFICE OF AUDRA IBARRA

26 Audra Ibarra (State Bar No. 177464)
530 Lytton Avenue, 2nd Floor

27 Palo Alto, CA 94301
28 Tel: [phone]

10
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY OF DISCOVERY MATERIAL AND
NON-WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION

1
2

Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Fees counsel for relator/Kershaw,
Cutter & Ratinoff, LLP

3
4
5

DATED: April 10, 2015.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY OF DISCOVERY MATERIAL AND
NON-WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION